Melchior FRANZ wrote: > Andy Ross wrote: > > I think it might be cleaner, though, for the Nasal subsystem to > > provide for a callback or "init script" that can be set by a caller. > > I'm not sure I understand. To request a callback I have to have Nasal > working already.
Yeah, that wasn't clear. I mean a C++ side callback. The interested subsystem could "register" itself with the NasalSys, and registered subsystems would get an nasal_init() callback after the Nasal subsystem was initialized. They could then be guaranteed a safe environment to execute their scripts. Alternatively, the whole subsystem API could get a "post_init()" method, which is called on all subsystems after the system initialization phase but before update() is called on any of them. Maybe this is an even cleaner solution... Andy _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
