On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:16:06 +0200, Gerard wrote in message 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 à 22:59 +0200, Arnt Karlsen a écrit :
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:38:55 +0200, Gerard wrote in message 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 
> > > Le vendredi 10 juin 2005 à 13:21 -0500, Dave Culp a écrit :
> > > > > >   //FDMctr++;
> > > > >
> > > > > Tested with my own  "carrier landing patched" release   :
> > > > > IT IS OK ==> no clone now, JSB specific Functions working
> > > > > after reset.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks Gerard,
> > > > 
> > > > I've commited the fix to the JSBSim CVS branches.  Note that
> > > > this will not  allow multiple instances of JSBSim, which nobody
> > > > is using right now (I don't  think?).  In the future we'll fix
> > > > it so that the "user" instance of JSBSim is  always the zeroeth
> > > > instance, and other instances will start at instance  number
> > > > one.
> > > > 
> > > > Dave
> > > 
> > > 
> > > As far as i try to understand, i don't find any specific needs
> > > which can ask for multiple instances of JSBSim....may be several 
> > > aircrafts in the same FG  (a waco glider towed by a -C47  ???)
> > 
> > ...formation flight, comparing a JSBSim C47 to a YaSim C47 flying 
> > side by side?
> > 
>   STOP..... i am becoming crazy  :-/\

..hush, we don't some white coats come grab you.   ;o)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.



_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to