Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 21:21 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a écrit : > * Gerard Robin -- Wednesday 22 June 2005 20:54: > > Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 19:54 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a écrit : > > > Oh, you mean the XML interpolation. That is even less concerned ... > > > Thank, that is i hoped to ear . > > I don't even know why I answered such a nonsense question. How realistic > is it that I check in a change to the controls handling that breaks the > XML animation/interpolation code? And why didn't you just try it out? > Next time I'll first demand that you explain why you think this could > be the case. Bah ... > > m. > Melchior
My grand-father told me: it is never nonsense questions, any questions are good :=) i thank you for the answer. That probably means that every questions without any returned answer are nonsense questions. My question was only due to a misunderstanding about the level that modification applied on. I am not able to test the last of the last CVS, every time, because you know, i need, before, to add personal patchs (in spite of having several versions in //). Last remark, it is better to be sure, before a modification will be applied, rather than discovering after, to late. Have i been able to answer to your sense question about my nonsense questions ? that is the question. :=) > -- Gerard _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
