Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: > Curtis L. Olson wrote: > > Ampere K. Hardraade wrote: > > > By cvs snapshots, I mean binary-snapshots packed into .deb, .rpm, etc. > > > If someone wants to do this, and promises to keep up on it, I can > > put a link on the FG web site ... > > How should the version number progress? Should it be 0.9.9, > 0.9.10, 0.9.11, etc. or 0.9.9.1, 0.9.9.2, 0.9.9.3, etc?
Snapshot builds should generally be identified by their date. Alternatively, you can use a sequential build number, as is common with large commercial projects. But real version numbers typically indicate a distinct "release", with a QA process, etc... Andy _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d