Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Good question, indeed! How could you? There was no discussion about
this topic on flightgear-devel before this order was announced, and
every discussion after that was passively suppressed by ignoring valid
arguments. How was this decision made and by whom? Is FlightGear no
longer "cooperative" (as in "working together")? Are we minor
developers now working for an elite that makes important decisions
off-list? This decisions making process sucks!
This is not to say that KLN89 needed to be in 1.0.0, but other
features urgently need to, unless 1.0.0 is meant to be a joke.
Melchior, I realize you want nothing but the best for FlightGear 1.0 but
then again, so do others. We're never going to satisfy anybody unless
1.0 will be the ultimate (and very last) version of FlightGear.
The decision has been mode to work to version 1.0, by Curtis. He's the
only one who can make such decisions since he's the one who's going to
release it, and lets face it, he's the one who puts (and has put) the
most work into this project. SO I back him up on this decision.
The next question would be: Do we want a rock stable 1.0 release with
less features or do we want a feature rich version of 1.0 which might be
buggy? I'd go for the first for obvious reasons.
Let's stick to the plan for a few weeks and after that we can basically
start doing whatever we want again.
Erik
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
