> From: "Ampere K. Hardraade" > > On January 2, 2006 03:42 pm, Erik Hofman wrote: > > Any reason for that? Personally I found this setup the most appealing. > > > > Erik > > Yes. When I look at the current arrangment, I get a sense that it is trying > to emphasize that FlightGear is a combat sim -- with the aircraft carrier and > the Spitfire taking focus. The aircraft carrier is just a feature, not the > center piece of FlightGear. >
Let me just add an "aye" to Ampere's suggestion. Even after building the P51D I'll admit to a preference for civil-ian aviation focus. Although, you know, technically the "Gunfighter" never actually saw any combat :-). There has also been some pretty impressive cockpit work done over the last two years. That said, I think Erik's pad looks pretty cool. I just think he should do two of them ;-) Best, Jim ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
