On Thursday 05 January 2006 23:32, Martin Spott wrote:
> Hello Durk,
>
> Durk Talsma wrote:
> > I still haven't firmly decided how ATC should interact with AI traffic,
> > but that these systems should be integrated has always been part of my
> > overarching design plan. Since my AI developments are based on extending
> > the AIModels code, this would naturally move toward a fully integrated
> > system.
>
> To me it's obvious why MP and AI are partially going to be merged some
> day, because both are 'exterior' sources of aircraft movement from the
> FlightGear users' point of view. If you think of integrating ATC with
> AI as well, then please keep in mind that a special situation arises
> because we are unlikely to convince AI aircraft to listen to 'human'
> ATC :-)
I would even go a step further:
I would like to introduce a common case for a dynamic object in flightgear.
An AImodel or an ATCthing or the original simulated aircraft should be such a
thing. That way we could unify some stuff.
Greetings
Mathias
--
Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv37&alloc_id865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
