From: Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* dene maxwell -- Friday 17 February 2006 10:50:
> >From: Melchior FRANZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Forget about "telnet". It's a normal tcp socket connection.
> That was the second part of my question, what would the syntax be under
> UDP... the same?
It would probably be the same. If it were implemented. But as it
doesn't make the least sense, it isn't.
m.
"Doesn't make the least sense" sorry don't understand this....
... Telenet being a application layer protocol requires alot more details as
to recipient and also alot higher overhead to implement...whereas UDP being
a trasport layer protocol is less distinct in is destination and requires
less overhead to implement.
Obviously interfacing at the different layers requires different levels of
distinction regardsing destnation etc.... this would imply a different
syntax at the very least.
Cheers
=Dene
_________________________________________________________________
Read the latest Hollywood gossip @ http://xtramsn.co.nz/entertainment
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
