"Julien Pierru" wrote:
> Exactly Vassilii that was the idea as a testing tool for what we will need
> to either find or develop to use with FG.
> We have to start somewhere.
I agree entirely, I just wanted to prevent Teamspeak to be officially
promoted as 'the' communication protocol/software for FlightGear.
There are two nice OpenSource PBX solutions: Asterisk and OpenPBX, a
fork of Asterisk which grew out of concerns over Asterisk being
controlled by a single company.
I once had an Asterisk-1.0.x server up and running but never announced
it to the public because 1.2.0 was soon to be released back these days
- afterwards I never set up a 1.2.x server ....
I think for the purpose of communication for FlightGear MP, both
Asterisk and OpenPBX will do the job. If time permits you'd probably
want to have a look at OpenPBX once the 0.2 release is out. I _suspect_
there will be better "conference" support for OpenPBX because the
fathers of Asterisk at Digium always tried to firmly couple conference
support to the presence of one of their interface boards ....
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
