On Thursday 06 April 2006 15:07, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> I think that this provides a sensible migration route to OSG, if that is
> the way we are going, otherwise it seems a good proposal in its own right.
> Apart
True,
I have most of that parts of ssg that are required by flightgear simgear
reimplemented using osg nodes below.
That is not yet ready for use, but that might be a useful way to go.
Greetings
Mathias
--
Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
