On Thursday 06 April 2006 17:17, Martin Spott wrote: > Melchior FRANZ wrote: > > I don't think we gain much from forking plib. *If* we have people > > interested in working on plib, those can as well ask for plib > > write access. > > Maybe my explanation was a bit incomplete. The idea was not so much > about spending effort to maintain PLIB. I thought about copying PLIB > into SimGear and fix only those parts, that are actually required by > SimGear. Parts that are not used should be removed. > > <snip> > > Cheers, > Martin.
Would it be a viable option to make FlightGear a non-graphical component, and let some "external" project take over the tasks of rendering? ie. Have another project called... let say ViewGear, for the graphics? Ampere ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
