On Saturday 15 April 2006 03:11 am, Paul Surgeon wrote: > Yes, I suppose it's not something that can be generically modeled easily. > Maybe it really should be modeled in nasal and left out of the engine > modeling all together since it'll be impossible to model correctly for all > engine types.
If the offsets/scales in the instrument configs aren't sufficient to adjust the EGT to what you would like then yes, nasal looks to be a good solution for you. But that's no reason to remove the EGT code from FGTurbine. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
