* Martin Spott -- Sunday 23 April 2006 19:49:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> >   http://members.aon.at/mfranz/cities.png  [390 kB]
> 
> Well-done, this comparison !

Thanks. :-)

Note that this is not a study about color variations. It's four screenshots
with city1.rgb textures from *cvs* mounted together. The first slices are
revisions 1.2 to 1.4. The first was almost right, just a tad too blue.
Note the violet area next to the shrub area. I shouldn't have criticized
that version 1, because from there it went downhill, and now we are at 3.
Well, I'm not, but 0.9.10 and HEAD is.   :-}



> I agree that 4.) is the most appropriate for the region _we_ live in,

True for the shrub texture, but it can well look as dry in Europe, too.
It's not a question of continent, but of climate. And I didn't say it
*should* be as green as in 4 ...



> >    The greener
> >    one seems like a better compromise. Maybe it should be in between?
> 
> I second the latter,

... but, yes, maybe a bit greener to match all sorts of shrubby areas.
I have no clue if the landuse sources distinguish dry shrub and green
shrub. If they do, then my complaint is invalid, of course.

But this wasn't the reason why I made the comparison. It was rather the
history of city[123].rgb, and this is even less a question of continent.
The required color profile is already defined by the texture *contents*.
This type of city doesn't go well with colors in 1, 2, and 3, no matter
where the city is located. (Maybe 4 is still a bit too blue, but taking
some blue away made it quickly uglier again.)

I could, of course, stop whining and just commit my versions. But this
would possibly interfere with Rob's sources (he may have created them
from higher res versions, in which it would better to adjust those).
And then, I saw a few negative spikes in the color profile of my
versions, and thought that this could be done cleaner.

m.


-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to