On Wed, 24 May 2006 12:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Martin Spott wrote: > > Just to let you share the look at the improvements in Scenery detail > that VMAP1 data might bring us, I set up a small demo on the Mapserver > site. Visit: > > http://mapserver.flightgear.org/ > > .... then select ICAO GVAC. Zoom into GVAC twice, add the two layers > 'intermittentstream_vmap1' and 'road_vmap1' (don't forget to set the > mouse-click mode back to "Pan") and hit refresh. This demo tells us an > interesting story about the quality of line data in VMAP0 .... > > I'm inclined to replace VMAP0 data in the Landcover DB with VMAP1 where > the latter is available, but first I'll have to investigate if the > extent of the VMAP1 tiles really and precisely matches the definition > of its bounding boxes. We don't want to see gaps or overlays - do we ?
Do you have a feel for how to resolve interfaces between regions where
we'd have to switch from vmap1 to vmap0?
Suggestion: make a tile once with vmap1 and once with vmap0, and make
available for dl, so people can give some input on fps hit?
Do the current rivercourses come from vmap0? I'm a bit confused at this
point about what comes from vmap0 and what comes from GSHHS.
Cheers,
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
