Hi Ben,
bsupnik wrote:
> - VATSIM could require a FG-client to use their libs (under some terms)
> as conditions for network approval. I thikn that VASTIM users are
> required as part of their membership agreement with the network to only
> use "approved" clients.
Honestly, I'm really curious to know what the _real_ driving force is
behind this protectionism.
Is this stupid arrogance ("if they want to participate, they'll have to
follow our rules - not matter if it makes sense"), simply incompetence
("one of these bad guys out there might compromise our servers if the
protocol gets published") or do they really have to fear something if
some third party implements their protocol ?
Anyway, if they don't want FlightGear users to participate .... does
anyone have an idea if the "FlightProject" network still is supported
by an active community ?
http://www.flightproject.net/
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
