On Friday 29 September 2006 14:44, flying.toaster wrote: > Don't get me wrong, > > I don't want to put a lot of restrictions to the right to distribute and > modify. In that sense GPL or OpenSource type of licence suit me. > > I just do not want people to make money out of my work (except maybe for > the *cost* of the media used to distribute), when I am not asking for any > money. Commercial software is OK for me, but if I want to go down that > path, I'll set up my own company. Well, you cannot prevent others from making money out of your work if you licensed your work under GPL. What you can do though, is make life extremely difficult for them. This is one of the reasons why my models are in pieces. You can bring this a step further by using multiple modelling formats. Essentially, this means your models would only work with FlightGear.
> Also I do not want this work, that I do > for entertainment, to be used for Real Life (TM) military purposes. The > latter is a moral position. I simply avoid this moral position by not creating any military model. :) > > If that means I'll have to make a separate package, so be it. But I am > still willing to distribute for the community to enjoy AND tweak at their > will as long as those two choices are respected. Ampere ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
