Hi,
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 00:55, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
> The current 3D clouds don't work on every machine, and I think its
> maintainer is gone as well. In my opinion, if 3D clouds is offered in OSG,
> then we should make use of it, because it probably is more robust and
> better tested than the one we have in FlightGear.
There is no direct 3D Cloud set on osg.
But we have an impostor implementation that renders into a texture. That osg
builtin RenderTexure replacement is more flexible and knows a primary and
secondary target. I plan to use FBO's as primary target - that should be the
best choice with todays graphics cards anyway - and as a fallback something
that is allways there. Maybe we can make that configurable.
But yes. I strongly believe that we are much more portable and much more
people will see 3d clouds. Or better everything that requires rendering in a
texture ...
Greetings
Mathias
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
