Quoting Didier Fabert : > hy, > > a reason to use OSG is a perf improvement with SMP. but i see nothing about > it > here. > my processor (amd 4200 double core) occupation is always 50-55%. perhaps is > it > not done yet? > > on the other hand, my processor let me use Atlas without reduce fgfs perf. > ps: fgfs is compiled with the "--with-threads" option
FGFS doesn't use threading much at that time. Only for the scenery loader and metar. One can thing of putting the FDM or AI in other threads, or maybe even divide the viewport into small areas that could be rendered in parallel. I don't know if its doable, but for now, you will only see an improvement running multiple programs in parallel. As you already see, Atlas or Terrasync can run on their own core and not disturb FG. -Fred -- Frédéric Bouvier http://frfoto.free.fr Photo gallery - album photo http://www.fotolia.fr/p/2278/partner/2278 Other photo gallery http://fgsd.sourceforge.net/ FlightGear Scenery Designer ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
