On 12/29/06, Roberto Inzerillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Typo:
But that's _my_ interest right now :-) That's because I ask for
suggestions and ideas here.
What ever approach we come up with needs to be done in a way that doesn't
invalidate all your efforts the next time we regenerate the world scenery or
the next time Robin Peel comes out with a new airport and taxiway data set.
I like to think about things "algorithmically", but I know that others
prefer to do manual touchups because you can build in so much more detail
and correctness that way. Some how we need to figure out how to bridge this
divide and make it easy for people to be able to do manual changes to the
airports if they like while still maintaining our ability to algorithmically
regenerate the world when ever some new revision of one of our data sets is
released.
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson - University of Minnesota - FlightGear Project
http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/ http://www.humanfirst.umn.edu/
http://www.flightgear.org
Unique text: 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
