On 02/15/2007 09:56 AM, Holger Wirtz wrote:
>>> My question was actually how to tell FG
>>> not to use its internaly ATIS.
> Hmmm... you misunderstand my approach for voice communication:
> There is a voice-server in thebackground which has for every frequency a
> conference room (as a simulation of radio frequencies).
>
> Ok, I have a air2air communication at 123.45 which can be easily
> replaced or supplemented with 122.75 - but this is also only a VoIP
> conference room :-)
There is still something confusing about this. Please consider
the following comparisons:
FACT ANALOGY
Radio is a broadcast medium. Any broadcast is in some ways a
type of conference.
Radio has a limited propagation A conference room has a limited
range. size.
KSFO ATIS broadcasts on 118.85 Imagine a onference room with a
(and several other frequencies). boombox constantly playing in the
room.
No aircraft should be transmitting There should never be any VOIP
on 118.85. traffic generated by ATIS.
Except as noted below, I cannot think of any reason why it would
be necessary or in any way desirable to defeat the ATIS function.
If there is a reason, please explain.
The only reason to defeat the /internal/ ATIS function would be
to replace it with a better ATIS function ... in which case you
would need to deal with many, many ATIS frequencies, not just
118.85.
Certainly we need a better ATIS function, but moving to /no/
ATIS function would be a step in the wrong direction.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
