John Wojnaroski wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
> >Sorry, John, this has nothing to do with "selective morality" - as you
> >allege. After reading these lines I'd say you have severe difficulties
> >telling the difference between flying and shooting/killing.
> >
> Ooooooo, I don't think so.....
>
> >To make understanding it easier: Many/most of the old but also the
> >modern warbirds are fascinating aircraft from a technical as well as
> >from an aviatic point of view - no doubt. Yet this is significantly
> >different from actually performing the shooting at some other aircraft
> >or dropping bombs.
> >
> >
> Ahhh, so the basis for acrobatic manuevering was... and the reason
> you need to put 9G's on your body is..... Your first point is quite
> correct, but again fly them to you heart's content and DON'T complain if
> others wish to do the same and simulate combat. That is all I am saying,
Yes, I _do_ domplain !
Here's your missing link: The simple reason that an aircraft was
originally _built_ for shooting and dropping bombs doesn't justify to
really _perform_ this action in a simulation as well. You're taking a
way too simple route here,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
