* Jon S. Berndt -- Saturday 10 November 2007: > > * Jon S. Berndt -- Saturday 10 November 2007: > > > The C172x is an experimental model [...] It should not be released.
> I think you missed my point. I was stating that I believe it should be > removed from FlightGear CVS. It shouldn't have been there in the first > place. Oh, sorry. I didn't consider moving files from JSBSim/CVS to fgfs/CVS a "release", and even less so on the fgfs mailing list (where we desperately wait for a release since ... a year? :-) Erik routinely merges JSBSim code into our CVS, and this was never seen as a "release". So I thought you defended the c172x' presence in fgfs/CVS and only meant it shouldn't be released with fgfs. > Some features from the C172x migrate to the other C172 models, which is > fine, but again the c172x is "not for prime time". It doesn't really > represent a real aircraft, as far as I am concerned. OK. Yes, the c172x dir in our CVS looks like an empty shell, unmaintained since years, broken since years. The c172x-set.xml is almost empty, etc. I'm not quick with removing stuff. I even kept as350 for now, although Maik wanted to get rid of it. But I'll remove the c172x, then. Thanks for clearing this up. :-) m. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
