On sam 10 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote: > On 10/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can notice the update has been done , before we could give any opinion > > on the topic. > > Does it mean , that there is not any other alternative, and the CHOICE is > > that way nothing else :) :) :) > > > >From my original message: > > <quote> > I just moved tailwheel-lock from lowercase 'l' to uppercase 'L', and > reassigned lowercase 'l' to toggle lighting (for easy night starts > without searching for switches). I assigned lighting to the lowercase > 'l' because I think it would be much more commonly used than tailwheel > lock, but if there are general objections (from DC-3 users?) I can > swap the two around so that tailwheel lock goes back to 'l'. > > Let me know what you think. > </quote> > > I or anyone else with access can change it again once there's a > consensus -- remember that CVS is the experimentation branch, not the > release branch. > > > All the best, > > > David > Oh, i am only like the dog which try to catch his tail.
Since we had the 'L" used with carrier , (this was talked before), i only wonder if it would not have been better to find a global agreement on which "key" can do what, before to make that update. There is some aircraft within CVS which are carrier compatible. With that update the launchbar will not work now. Regards -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
