Melchior FRANZ schrieb: > * Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 29 November 2007: > >> That would be easy, but I haven't even committed it, because it >> has some problems: >> > > Oh, and it doesn't respect the true glide slope angle. It always > uses 3 degree, although some have 3.5. (But then again, I'm not > sure if fgfs makes a difference, so this could be consistently > wrong. ;-) > > m. > > Hi Melchior,
I respect your arguments. Some of them I did not notice as I just was lucky when testing it, it altway matched runway and wind-direction. And I did not see it like a command flightpath display but just as a training device for people who really have no idea how to get their (bigger) aircraft landed in some realistic way. Ok, one could just use the approach lighting system to have a simple help, but these big read sqares of your "gstunnel" are a lot easier to use. Could you imagine to put this nasal file into the Nasal folder of the upcoming release *deactivated*, ie. named "gstunnel.nas.off" or something like that? I would like to present this help in the German FlightGear Forum after the 0.9.11 is out and it would only be a little step for the user to rename this file and then use this option - if wanted. Regards Georg ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
