On lun 3 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > For those who want to avoid the message already now, here's a list > of models still using the "noshadow" prefix. Note that some objects > use a "noshadow" *postfix*. This doesn't cause error messages, but > it will also not discard shadows. Never has. > > ./A-10/Models/A10-004-015l2.ac > ./A-6E/Models/A-6E.ac > ./Albatross/Models/pdisk.ac > ./Buccaneer/Models/buccaneer.ac postfix > ./DH-89/Models/transparent.ac > ./F-86/Models/transparent.ac > ./F4U/Models/blaze.ac > ./F4U/Models/pdisk.ac > ./F4U/Models/transparent.ac > ./F80C/Models/Instruments/Gunsight/gunsight.ac > ./F80C/Models/f80.ac > ./Hunter/Models/hunter-ga11.ac partly postfix > ./Hurricane/Models/hurricane-new.ac > ./Hurricane/Models/hurricane-ver-25.ac > ./Lightning/Models/exhaust.ac > ./OV10/Models/CDF/OV10.ac > ./OV10/Models/NASA/OV10_NATO.ac > ./OV10/Models/USAFE/Instruments/Gunsight/gunsight.ac > ./OV10/Models/USAFE/OV10_NATO.ac > ./SR71-BlackBird/Instruments/Models/ai-bb.ac > ./SR71-BlackBird/Models/SR-71A-Blackbird.ac postfix > ./SR71-BlackBird/Models/SR-71B-Blackbird.ac postfix > ./SR71-BlackBird/Models/SR71-Cockpit-avant.ac postfix > ./SeaVixen/Models/MB-Mk4.ac postfix > ./Sikorsky-S58/Models/s58.ac > ./Spitfire/Models/seafireIIIc.ac > ./Spitfire/Models/spitfireIIa.ac > ./an2/Model/an2_r.ac > ./beaufighter/Models/blaze.ac > ./beaufighter/Models/pdisk.ac > ./beaufighter/Models/transparent.ac > ./bf109/Models/blaze.ac > ./bf109/Models/blaze2.ac > ./bf109/Models/pdisk.ac > ./bf109/Models/transparent.ac > ./fw190/Models/blaze.ac > ./fw190/Models/fw190a8.ac > ./fw190/Models/pdisk.ac > ./fw190/Models/transparent.ac > ./jeep/Models/roof.ac > ./jeep/Models/transparent.ac > ./ju52/Models/ju52.ac > ./mosquito/Models/pdisk.ac > ./mosquito/Models/transparent.ac > ./pa24-250/Models/propDisc/fastprop.ac > ./seahawk/Models/SeaHawk-FGA6-WV859.ac partly postfix > ./seahawk/Models/exhausts.ac > ./spitfireIX/Models/pdisk.ac > ./spitfireIX/Models/transparent.ac > ./vulcanb2/Models/exhaust.ac > > m. >
Thanks, i guess we can keep these deprecated <object-name>. We only have to check that the shadow animation is there with <type>noshadow</type (if we want shadow) I know i have old models with "noshadow" prefix, which should not be a problem (i hope) because shadow is processed elsewhere within the model, with <type>noshadow</type animation. Cheers -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
