On Thursday 06 December 2007 19:49, Tatsuhiro Nishioka wrote:
> I could code it during xmas, however it would be in the language
> I know best
>
> : C#
> :
> for mono using GTK#.
>
> I would not be able to integrate the feature with either fgrun or
> fgfs directly.
>
> It would be a stand alone program. If you wanted: a fgfs protocol
> (using nasal
>
> maybe) + C# daemon.
>
> It doesn't have to be embedded in fgfs or fgrun, but can be a
> separated program like yours or GUI launcher on each platform at
> this moment as long as the pack age description is properly defined. 
>
> So I guess what we need to discuss is not the program itself but
> the format of description.
> I'd like to help on this. I also want to make some sample
> description and samp le program
> of this feature on Mac OS X if I have some spare time at around the
> end of thi s year.
>
> Best,
>
> Tat

I'd like to suggest at this point is that if anyone has an idea for a 
new FG add-on feature they should think about making it 
a 'distributed' prog that doesn't necessarily have to run on the same 
system as FG.

Now that multi-core cpus are mainstream we have to accept that FG's 
current architecture is obsolete.

No intention to upset anyone but that's the facts.

LeeE

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to