Hi Erik 

> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear on 32 bits versus 64 bits
> system
> 
> Vivian Meazza wrote:
> > As you know, I am. I have profiled the cvs-head. Nasal/hash.c seems to
> be a
> > _very_ significant CPU hog, but I can't link it to the staggers. I note
> > however that when I profile an old FG/osg from last Apr, it is stagger
> free,
> > and hash.c doesn't figure in the profiling.
> >
> One hint, try running with: --disable-ai-models
> 

Er  ... couple of words spring to mind there - grandmother and eggs :-). But
I know that you are trying to help.

I'm profiling with absolutely _everything_ disabled (including replay). _If_
that had shown that the stagger went away I would have reintroduced features
one by one. But I can't even get that far atm. Still trying though, and
still trying to identify the cause. I note, however, that not long ago we
had a very good solution, so it's something we have done, and relatively
recently.

Vivian 



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to