Curtis Olson wrote: > What aircraft is being flown in these tests? If hash.c looks like a > hotspot, that could also be triggered by an aircraft that had a lot of > new nasal code added. Or it could be newly added default system nasal > code? I don't know how much of FlightGear functions anymore without > nasal, but disabling the default nasal directory and picking an > aircraft with little or no embedded nasal code might also be an > interesting test. We could possibly have crossed a threshold in terms > of the amount of nasal code used for some particular aircraft? > The F-16, for one (the one I test with the most), doesn't use much nasal code (and neither do for instance the Fokker-100 and T-38). I must say, I don't seem to see the problems others are reporting. I thought I was .. but it turned out to be a different problem after all.
Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
