On 3 Nov 2008, at 00:30, Tim Moore wrote: > I know that Boost is well supported on Linux and see that it is on > Windows as > well, though I have no direct experience with that. Are there any > objections to > or comments about adding Boost as a FlightGear dependency?
My recollection is that parts of Boost (possibly the parser module?) are implemented in a templated way that can cause quite amazing code size increases. This was the reason for not using it in another project I was involved with, a couple of years ago. It may well be that improvements in compiler code-gen for templates have fixed this - or more likely, the issues is in parts of Boost that won't be touched. Regards, James ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
