"Csaba Halász" wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Martin Spott wrote:
> > .... and probably add a warning that people have to remove lines 25-27
> > in the basic 'CMakeLists.txt' of OpenSceneGraph (2.7.3) if they don't
> > use at least CMake version 2.6.1 (as I understand from a quick read),
>
> But of course we use cmake/cvs, so no problem there :->
Folks, don't get me wrong: At the end of the day I'm quite happy to see
someone (Tim) taking care for maintaining FlightGear's graphics/
scenegraph subsystem. Especially at times when sustained improvements
to FlightGear's core features are an extremely rare item, each of these
makes a very valuable highlight.
I didn't aim at seriously criticising Tim's approach. What actually
made me grin about this story (and what finally lead to my 'pronounced'
comment) is the fundamental change in FG's "development philosophy":
For an incredibly long time people were willingly paying any price for
maintaining FlightGear's compilance with the latest PLIB release - even
though that's been already years old. Nowadays you have to compile most
of the dependencies from source - what a change !
Best regards,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
