On jeudi 20 novembre 2008, Martin Spott wrote: > gerard robin wrote: > > On mercredi 19 novembre 2008, Martin Spott wrote: > > > Tim Moore wrote: > > > > Seriously, I imagine that people don't mind needing OSG SVN. There > > > > isn't currently an autoconf test for the OSG version; that would > > > > probably be useful. > > > > > > Indeed - and for the Boost version as well. > > > > Sorry i don't share your opinion :) > > Do you have a better proposal wrt. proper procedures for dealing with > dependencies on specific library versions ? This sort of autoconf tests > is a pretty common and proven measure, > > Martin.
No sorry, i said it before, to me the easyest way is to work with stable OSG version only. I have just enough time to "play" with the progress of FG cvs, not to permanently update my system with each new SVN OSG , and probably the newbee BOOST. However, i can understand that some developper have enough time to work with it. I will wait for the coming of these stable version. Cheers -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. Voltaire ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
