Matthew Tippett wrote: > As per other discussions, there is nothing stopping fg from creating a > set of support libraries that exist in /opt/flightgear. This can be > an optional 'we admit we are on the bleeding edge' support package > that can be made broadly compatible. > > If people are interested in a recommended approach for building > broadly compatible binaries, then please speak up. We are :)
Tim > > Regards... Matthew > > > On 11/20/08, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On vendredi 21 novembre 2008, gerard robin wrote: >>> On vendredi 21 novembre 2008, Csaba Halász wrote: >>>> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> FlightGear now has a dependency on the Boost library header files. See >>>>> boost.org or your favorite distribution. I built against version 1.34, >>>>> but the latest (1.37) should be fine too. >>>> Okay, I know I am kind of late with this, but I just found out that >>>> debian stable comes with 1.33. Upgrading to 1.34 would mean having to >>>> upgrade gcc to 4.2 and libstdc++ as well. Which would cascade to a lot >>>> of other programs. Assuming you haven't used it extensively in ready >>>> but not checked in code, I suggest to postpone boost usage until after >>>> the planned release is made. Hopefully by the time we release our next >>>> version after that, distributions will be shipping 1.34 or later. >>>> >>>> Just an idea. >>> We will need a rule, these library could bring up to us a consistency >>> problem. >>> On my side, if i look at the wide range of distributions, since i use to >>> install and to update FG on my friends computers,( with Debian, Fedora, >>> and >>> Suze some are 32 bit one is 64 bit ). And i don't include my wife >>> computer :) :) >>> I fear that we won't never have the same version at the same time, but to >>> freeze at a specific stable version ( same problem with OSG). >>> >>> Cheers >> If no rule, there will be the lucky users/devel who will continue on to >> update >> FG with CVS update. >> Behind the others more or less lucky whose the progress will look like an >> iregular dotted line. >> I will regret the PLIB time ( dead period time) when everything was stable. >> What about a specific Boost source dedicated to FlightGear which could be >> said stable , and easily built by any user with any distribution. >> >> -- >> Gérard >> http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ >> >> J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. >> Voltaire >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge >> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great >> prizes >> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world >> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Flightgear-devel mailing list >> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
