On 27 Dec 2008, at 09:39, Durk Talsma wrote: > On Saturday 27 December 2008 10:11:46 Stuart Buchanan wrote: >> I think it's something we need to bear in mind for the next >> release. We'll >> need to put more effort to get external testing of RCs on Windows/ >> ATI. > > Yes, I agree, but the problem is how to do that. For this release, > we've had > two release candidates, for both of which we've had full fledged > windows > packages, and -as far as I can tell- we've received no comments > regarding the > problems I'm reading reports about in the forums now. Unfortunately, > it > usually happens this way. It would be great if we could manage to > get some > more user feedback on the release candidates.
Right - realistically, in the real world, people don't run -RCs, they wait until they see a release announcement, then test and complain. That just seems to be the way of software development :) I've got a Radeon X1600 in my MacBook Pro, and don't see these issues, but I guess the OS-X ATI driver stack is quite different from the Windows stack. It'd be lovely to know if there are Windows ATI users who *can* run 1.9.0 without problems. James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
