I'd like to thank the people who have responded to my rant - they 
have all done so in a considered, thoughtful and positive manner 
and have not taken anything personally, for which I am extremely 
relieved.

While some people have pointed out that work is already being done 
to address some of the issues I tried to highlight, I still think 
that many of these efforts are a case of trying to ameliorate 
problems that need not exist in the first place.  Just as these 
people disagree with what I've said, and even though I have immense 
respect for their opinions and views, I'm afraid that I still have 
to disagree with them.

I'd also like to thank Brain Schack for that link to the "A New 
Architecture for FlightGear Flight Simulator" document, which I 
think everyone involved with the development of FG should read.  
This document really trumps my posting because not only does it 
raise the same issues but also suggests some specific approaches 
and solutions to answer them.  While the issues that worry me might 
still beyond the horizon I think it is certain that they will 
arrive here one day, and in the not too distant future.  Indeed, it 
has been the early signs of these issues, which has forewarned of 
their coming, that motivated me to post and the authors of that doc 
to put the time and effort in to researching and producing it in 
the first place.

If the only thing that my post achieves is to get more people to 
read and think about that doc then it will have been worthwhile.

Regards,

LeeE

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to