On dimanche 25 janvier 2009, Durk Talsma wrote: > On Sunday 25 January 2009 21:49:21 Jon S. Berndt wrote: > > I would hope that synching JSBSim would be seamless by now. Of course, it > > doesn't usually work like that. :-) > > The part we considered "risky" was that possibly quite a few aircraft > needed an update to their configuration files, in order to make use and/or > function correctly with the latest JSBSim features. This would probably > require more time than we'd like. At least that is my understanding. > > I don't think that anybody would consider a new JSBSim version risky in > terms of crashing FlightGear or inducing compiler errors. :-) > > Cheers, > Durk >
In case of the quality is our target. http://lists.openscenegraph.org/pipermail/osg-users-openscenegraph.org/2009-January/021991.html -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. Voltaire ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
