On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 04:07 +0100, Csaba Halász wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Ron Jensen <w...@jentronics.com> wrote: > > > > A simple onespeed supercharger example is shown below: > > <numboostspeeds> 1 </numboostspeeds> > > <ratedboost1> 8.15</ratedboost1> <!-- 46.5 inHg --> > > <ratedpower1> 1900 </ratedpower1> <!-- Horsepower --> > > <ratedrpm1> 2600 </ratedrpm1> > > <ratedaltitude1> 0 </ratedaltitude1> > > >From an xml standpoint, all those 1s look horrible (I mean > ratedboost1, ratedpower1, etc). > Is it too late to do away with them? > I would suggest something like: > > <supercharger> > <stage> > <boost>8.15</boost> > <power>1900</power> > <rpm>2600</rpm> > <altitude>0</altitude> > </stage> > <stage> > <!-- stage #2 here --> > </stage> > </supercharger> > > I am saying this without any knowledge of the existing conventions and > compatibility issues, so feel free to ignore it :)
It probably is too late to do away with them, this is a legacy definition. Its also rather clumsy to use, which is why I posted a functional sample. But if Jon B is good with changing it, I'd be happy to. Ron ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
