Erik Hofman wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
> > Overall, I think some day "the crowd" should start making up their mind
> > about wether relying on an externally maintained FDM is still the way
> > to go. Developing a copy of the FDM _in_ FlightGear might return a much
> > higher benefit at reduced effort.
>
> I more concerned about FDM's that are in FlightGear an which have not
> been maintained for over five years now.
Well, they do compile, I suspect the even still work (I currently don't
have a computer at hand that would allow to check), at least they
didn't diverge from the respective aircraft- and engine configuration
in the FlightGear Base Package .... simply because the latter have not
changed either. Therefore I'd say that's a different topic.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
