Nicolas Quijano wrote: > If the coupling is not of the hair pulling type, it might be > conceivable to integrate another scripting language alongside Nasal > for starters, and in time, completely replace it if one is so inclined :) At the risk of diverting the thread, and not wanting to get into religious argument, but I'm genuinely curious as to why would you even want to do this? Is there something that Lua (or any other language) can do that you can't do in Nasal?
If there is, then it would probably be better to fix it in Nasal than it would be to embed a whole new scripting language. As Ron has indicated already, while it would be possible, you are talking an immense undertaking to "replace" Nasal, and it seems that there really isn't any actual return on that investment (not that this is necessarily a bad thing, plenty of things are done just for the hell of it). -- James Sleeman ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
