On dimanche 08 mars 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote: > * Nicolas Quijano -- Sunday 08 March 2009: > > As for "secret sources", they'll name themselves if they feel > > like it, > > That would be fun! But I won't hold my breath. >
I don't know if i am part of that "secret sources", anyhow , in my case, avoiding to use a Nasal script when that is not necessary , won't lead to the conclusion that we don't like Nasal, but more or less we ignore it :) I said it before most of the features animation, electrical, hydraulical, autopilot, ...... etc, which are necessary when making a model with JSBsim can be done without Nasal. I have kept some old Archives of FG were the keyboard definition is mostly xml, the main features are still working. Then my personal configuration only use the minimum of Nasal with it. I concluded that the question is not to to use Nasal , LUA or any other script language, the question to me, is the larger we have the choice of tools and the freedom ( no stupid dictat ) to use or not according to our personal configuration, the better will be the system. Regards -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. Voltaire ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
