Erik Hofman wrote: > > Tim Moore wrote: >> property node aggregates and aggregate C++ types is not a real problem >> coding-wise. I just don't like the current XML syntax. > > If this is you main motivation I'm just plain against this. > But I have the feeling that you're gonna regret this comment. Perhaps. I'm not proposing to change the syntax you like. I just want to evolve the very useful property system to support the syntax I like.
Tim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
