On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Barry Fawthrop <ba...@isscp.com> wrote:

Hi Barry,

I have taken a read of this email and can suggest a few things to try.
See my inline comments below.

> To All,  Thanks  Very  Much
>
>
> Victhor:   glxgears gives me between 882 - 1068 FPS 5450 frame in 5.0 seconds
>
This seems to be a bit slow as I'm getting a 900-100 fps on my Intel
video laptop. Howevere glxgears is not a benchmarking program but an
indication that something could be wrong. I'm unable to get you this
figures for my nvidia based desktop.

> Arnt:      I'm running the LENNY version of Debian Yes,  Should I change this 
> ???
>

No, Lenny is considered to be stable so I wouldn't be doing anything
rash like downgrading to Etch.

> Stefan     I did install everything from scratch OSG, plib, fg base yes
>
> Arnt:      SOME of my installed  nVidia drivers
>  nvidia-kernel-2.6.26-1-686-bigmem            173.14.09+3              NVIDIA 
> binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.26
>  nvidia-kernel-2.6.26-1-vserver-686-bigmem    173.14.09-5+2.6.26-13    NVIDIA 
> binary kernel module for Linux 2.6.26
>  nvidia-kernel-common                         20080825+1               NVIDIA 
> binary kernel module common files
>  nvidia-kernel-source                         180.44-2                 NVIDIA 
> binary kernel module source
>  nvidia-settings                              173.14.09-1              Tool 
> of configuring the NVIDIA graphics drivers
>

While I'm running Ubuntu rather than Debian (basically same animal), I
have noted that I have packages that contain the device modaliases
which the nvidia driver requires. However, this could be a difference
between Debian and Ubuntu.


> Curtis:    Sadly this is the only opengl 3d program that I know of that I 
> run,  what would you suggest I test with ?
>

Sometimes comparing results on another machine will shine light in an
area that you haven't considered. If you can't do this then don't
worrry.

> Also can someone explain why the initial graphics looks messed up
> http://www.8thdaymediaonline.com/fgfs-screen-002.ppm  taken soon after it 
> loads and "should" shows the plane and the
> KSFO runway
>

It looks to me like the view is below the ground, hence you see
skyscrapers below the ground. This is a common trick for re-using
models for different sized generic buildings. I'n not sure why the
aircraft's cockpit isn't being displayed.

I am wondering if you are hitting the Mesa conflict issue. Could you
supply the output of glxinfo? The top 50 lines should be plenty.  It
should say "direct rendering: yes", capitalisation may vary different.

I am wondering how much video memory is your card has. (Anyone know if
64MB is okay for flightgear?). The nVidia 6200 cards appears to be
128MB as standard.

Regards


George

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & 
iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com 
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to