On Thursday 25 Jun 2009, Maik Justus wrote:
> Hello Olivier,
>
> Olivier Faivre schrieb am 25.06.2009 20:52:
> > Hello guys,
> > ...
> > Actually, the wing is done with only one piece, 7° dihedral, no
> > twist. Can I use the "mstab" command to specify the outer wing
> > and the regular "wing" command for the inner one ?
>
> yes
>
> > In the readme file, I read this for mstab : these surfaces are
> > not involved with the solver computation these surfaces are not
> > involved with the solver computation...
> >
> > I'm not sure to well understand.
>
> if you define a yasim FDM you have to define two configurations
> with different airspeed, typ. cruise and approach. Yasim modifies
> lift and drag factors and the incidence of the wing to meet these
> configurations. Therefore the incidence of a wing will be
> modified by the yasim solver (only once - when the model is
> loaded) while the incidence of a mstab is unchanged.

I just thought I'd point out that the YASim solver sets the 
incidence for the <hstab> element, not the <wing> element.

Thus, you can specify the incidence for the <wing>, but not for the 
<hstab>.  There is also an INCIDENCE control-axis in YASim, which 
should allow the <wing> element incidence to be changed in flight 
and I think the F-8E, which is shown on the FG aircraft download 
web-page, may actually use this.  However, when I've tried using 
the INCIDENCE control-axis with <vstab> or <mstab> elements, to 
simulate all-moving/slab tailfins/rudders (as in the BAC-TSR2) or 
all-moving canards (as in the SU-37) it has had no aerodynamic 
affect at all.

YASim does indeed generate drag factors for <wing>, <vstab> and 
<mstab> elements, but it is possible to modify the the AoA related 
drag forces by including suitable <idrag> elements .  This seems to 
work well when you're trying to simulate all-moving tailplanes, for 
example, if you specify a very low <idrag> factor for the <hstab> 
element.

I also experimented with using <mstabs> to more accurately model the 
correct shape of wings when developing the Canberra-B(I)8 YASim 
config but found that the solver does indeed ignore the <mstab> 
elements when working out its stuff.  While I could get it to 
solve, the effect was that of just having the very short inner wing 
panels.  The <vstab> and <mstab> elements do have directional 
effects however, and the control-surface sub-elements, such as 
<flapn> and <spoiler> will also have an effect.

For the main lifting surface then, using a full-span <wing> element 
will give more accurate results than a combination of <wing> and 
<mstab> elements because the <mstab> elements will be ignored.  
Although this may seem less than ideal, it's possible to fine-tune 
the single <wing> element to get very close to the real world 
characteristics, and certainly closer than you could get with a 
<wing> and <mstab> combination.

LeeE

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to