Jacob Burbach wrote:
>> Next time you do that you'd probably consider acknowledging the
>> respective attributes in the OSM data: They're explicitly marking these
>> sections of the railroad as running through a tunnel ;-)
>
> Interesting, seems I may have totally overlooked that one, I'll look
> into it. I can prob have those sections automatically removed at the
> beginning of my pipeline then.
I'm pretty much convinced that your goal and ours are not that far
apart from each other. In other words: "pushing things to a new level"
doesn't make your project a unique one.
BUT we're taking different routes to get there - obviously. "We",
sometimes also known as The Custom Scenery Project, are researching how
to automate as many of the involved refinement steps as possible while
still allowing for manual editing, in order to let the entire World
Scenery benefit from certain improvements, not just distinct, local
areas. Inspecting the details of OSM data is just one sample from a
list of items ;-)
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
