James Turner wrote:
> I agree with Martin here - I think we need more accurate behaviour
> here, but it's easy to keep the current behaviour as an option,
> controlled by a flag - something I've been considering for a while
> anyway - eg /sim/realism prop. Possibly the same could apply to the
> false GS and LOC lobes.
.... as well as runway lightning and probably a few more 'gimmicks'
which depend on the active runway. Last but not least this would allow
to have/create/add a general interface onto which to hook different
methods to define the active runway (driven by wind direction,
randomly, by manual operator, whatever) and let all dependent gimmicks
to behave accordingly,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
