On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Alex Perry <alex.pe...@ieee.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Tom P <zomm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I've tried to push a Mercurial test repository (FlightGear converted from
>> CVS) to code.google.com for a few hours, without success.
>> It aborts regularly with the following message:
>> searching for changes
>> abort: error: Connection timed out
>>
>> After digging a bit, it looks like I stumbled on a known issue.. ooops!!
>>   http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=2716
>
> Could you put the exact repository you're trying to push somewhere
> where I can get at it?  Feel free to try sending a tarball to me
> directly by email on the off chance it fits through the gateways.

The exact tarball Tom sent over uploaded fine for me over home broadband:
http://code.google.com/p/support/issues/detail?id=2716#c22

Therefore, in addition to the bitbucket repository Tom mentioned
below, we also have:
hg clone https://possible-little-test.googlecode.com/hg FlightGear-0.9

Both seem to work for me, so it'd probably be a good idea to do the
Mercurial client tool usability testing against both repositories in
case there is a difference we care about.

>> So, next I tried on bitbucket.org, which is the mainstream Hg hosting site,
>> and gladly it worked as expected.
>> The complete FlightGear repo got pushed in 11minutes,
>> and for your reference, is available here:
>>   http://bitbucket.org/tomp/fg-test/
>>
>> The only thing that I don't like about bitbucket.org is that repositories
>> are not organized by project, like on gitorious.org, but only per person.
>> It makes sense for an anarchic... err, deeply distributed development model,
>> but could get confusing quickly if we want to stick to a semi-centralized
>> one.
>
> I don't think that's a factor for people trying out the client side
> tools for Hg to see whether they suitably usable.
>
>> What now?
>> I'll try to break TortoiseGit on the Windows side of things.
>> Somehow I'm not convinced that Qt would use Git if it was so broken on
>> Windows, but it's just me.
>>
>> Have fun!
>>
>>   Tom
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Erik Hofman <e...@ehofman.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Olaf Flebbe wrote:
>>> > Windows Implementations:
>>> >
>>> > git can be tedious to use on Windows: I had big problems working on a
>>> > project mixing up git repositories on linux pushed and pulled by a
>>> > windows git via samba. git at some point complained about non existing
>>> > differences: Somehow line ending issues emerged, or the object store got
>>> > corrupted. I had no chance to look deeper into details. The stable git
>>> > command on Windows needs cygwin, which is not a minimal invasive
>>> > installation. (I wouldn't recommend the msys/mingw installation at this
>>> > point.)
>>> >
>>> > The hg (mercurial) Implementation of Windows is very lean, because no
>>> > POSIX emulation layer is needed. I (luckily?) had no problems with
>>> > respect to line endings with hg.
>>>
>>> This alone leaves me to rethink about git in favor of hg. Either are
>>> fine with me in the end but I would hate to lose Windows developers over
>>> this.
>>>
>>> Erik
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
>>> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
>>> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
>>> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register
>>> now&#33;
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Flightgear-devel mailing list
>>> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
>> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
>> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
>> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
>> _______________________________________________
>> Flightgear-devel mailing list
>> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>>
>>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to