James Turner wrote:
> There's quite a lot of improvements that could be made to higher
> levels of MP, if arbitrary properties could be synchronised over MP :)
As far as _I_ remember, the current state of the protocol was _not_
designed for having everyone dump arbitrary data to the crowd but
instead to allow for synchronization of positions, velocities and
accelerations at reduced latency even over low-bandwidth lines. The
current MP protocol is probably not perfect, but I think it still does
quite a good job at its intended purpose. I remember running MP over a
64 kBit's ISDN line at satisfactory performance.
If bandwidth is not a matter, then you'd probably want to jump on the
HLA train and join the CERTI/VirtualAir effort. They're offering
everything like subscribing to attributes and the such .... yet I have
to state that reduced bandwidth footprint, compared to the current
state, would be beneficial to have in CERTI ;-)
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
