On 29/01/10 21:20, Erik Hofman wrote: > Pete Morgan wrote: > >> I would gladly make a contribution to FlightGear. >> > Please tell me you're not affiliated with FlightPro sim.. >
Seems to me, that Pete has asked a reasonable question, why shoot back such an unpleasant accusation? Pete has been documenting bugs and misfeatures here on the list recently, seeming like he is doing some fairly thorough testing of things. While perhaps Pete doesn't always report them in the most, shall we say, tactful manner, I'm sure that this is a useful development contribution. I've also noted in some of his posts that Pete has been working to fix bugs, for example tuning the autopilot. In comparison, the only thing FlightProSim has ever done for FlightGear is download, recompile and rip off everybody's screenshots to sell it. In short, I think that Pete is nothing like FlightProSim. And if Pete wants to make some money by adding value to FlightGear for a specific use, more power to him, he's certainly not the only one on this list who would be using FlightGear in the course of their job. Especially since in doing so he is obviously keen to improve FlightGear itself and not just silently stand on the backs of all the rest of the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
