On Wednesday 24 Feb 2010, Durk Talsma wrote: [snip...] > > As follows from this, I have to add that I'm not too excited > about all the invidual hangars, and scenery repository sites > (such as "unitedfreeworld") that I'm seeing spring to life right > now. I do realize that these sites serve their purpose as a > temporary storage for material that needs further refinement, and > also accept the fact that some materials simply cannot be added > to cvs due to the fact that original materials were incompatible > with the GPL, but apart from these cases, I do believe that it > should be encouraged that eligible materials go into CVS. > > Cheers, > Durk
While I agree with the reasoning behind only using aircraft that are owned by the FG project for promotional screenshots I simply don't understand the sentiments behind what you said above. If people _want_ to offer their work to the FG project that's fine, and I was always happy to do so, but your statement above seems to suggest to me that you believe that the FG project should be _entitled_ to ownership of any works produced in connection with it. Not even Microsoft seeks such a monopoly over applications and data that is used with its products. While the GPL is liked and approved of by many, myself included, it must be recognised that not everybody likes it or wishes to release their work under it. Furthermore, it is not a case of the GPL being _right_ and everything else being _wrong_: people should be allowed to release their work under whatever conditions they choose. I'm afraid that that last paragraph really smacked of control freakery to me, which is precisely what what open-source is _not_ all about. And that's not even getting into the issue of control without responsibility, for if the FG project is to control everything, is it in a position to accept the responsibility of maintaining and fixing it all? LeeE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
