On 10 Mar 2010, at 15:44, syd adams wrote: > It is a bit of a turn off though, when I try to fix some minor issues and get > back into the coding side of things. and its immediately rewritten without > notice.
I apologise for committing the modified changes without asking - I felt my modifications were fairly straightforward, and hence unlikely to be a problem. The actual core logic should be exactly as you provided in the patch. > My main wish is that the enabling option be renamed to > <has-overspeed-indicator> (or something more appropriate). > And that it not break should it be enabled with no parameters.Yes , it could > happen :). Understood, I'll fix these later on today. I'm still not-exactly-trhilled about hard-coding the B1900 numbers, but I don't have a better suggestion either! James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
