Hi, > > I was about to write that I don't have any idea. Glad to > read the > problem resolved. Does it make a difference in term of > speed. What is > your prefered index and what is your hardware. It could be > handy to > build a scale "level vs hardware" > > -Fred >
Well, to be honest- I have currently the problem "graphic appearence vs level vs hardware" ;-) With A dualcore 2.8GHz, 2GB Ram, Nvidea 8800GT, Vsync (60Hz) I use a level of 2.2. The Geoemetry shader doesn't look that well to me, and decreases the fps very, very strong (unusuable). I must really admit that I don't like the Geometry shader on forest, even without Geometry-shader it doesn't look well to me on forest-textures, sorry! I prefer to have trees and as I can remember Tim Moore suggested once time ago in the IRC-chat a improvememt to increase the numbers of trees without decreasing of fps. No idea if we have this now... For the record: C172p, KSFO 28R, Fair Weather, Framerate-Throttle disabled Level fps 0 50 1 45 2 45 3 45 4 20-30 and sometimes less than 20 5 20-30 and sometimes less than 20 Cheers Heiko __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
